Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

An arbitrator's decision is called an award,but only if the arbitrator orders the defendant to pay the plaintiff monetary compensation.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Billy knows that he can bring his case against Bob in a state court in Tennessee.He is unsure,however,of which county in which to proceed.Which of the following addresses the proper county?


A) In personam jurisdiction
B) Venue
C) Subject-matter jurisdiction
D) Diversity jurisdiction
E) Long-arm jurisdiction

F) A) and D)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Med-arb is a dispute resolution process in which the parties agree to start out in arbitration and,if the arbitration is unsuccessful on one or more points,to move on to mediation.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A reply is a formal answer to a motion for summary judgment.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The justices of the United States Supreme Court serve ten-year terms of appointment,subject to renewal by the advice and consent of the U.S.Senate.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Adult siblings John,Sam,and Andy are in disagreement over how to split the proceeds of a piece of land left to them by a rich uncle who recently died.The uncle was a resident of Georgia and the land is in Georgia; however,neither John,Sam,nor Andy live there.Which of the following is true regarding jurisdiction over the dispute?


A) A court in Georgia would not have jurisdiction.The case would have to be brought in a state in which at least one of the brothers lives.
B) A court in Georgia would have in rem jurisdiction over the dispute.
C) A court in Georgia would have in personam jurisdiction over the dispute.
D) A court in Georgia would have jurisdiction over the dispute only if all brothers signed a consent form agreeing to bring the case in Georgia.
E) A court in Georgia would have original jurisdiction,but appellate jurisdiction would be in a state in which at least one of the brothers lives.

F) A) and B)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Sexual Harassment ADR.Jenny is very angry with her supervisor,Sleaze,at the Mexican fast-food restaurant at which she works which is owned by an international company located in Mexico.He has been making inappropriate sexual comments to her and other employees.Jenny decides to sue and retains a lawyer,Brice.Brice talks with the owners of the restaurant and is informed that Jenny signed an agreement to arbitrate any claims.Brice tells Jenny that it is completely up to her and that if she wishes,she can disregard the arbitration agreement and proceed to court.Jenny informed Brice about other employees who had complained about sexual harassment and entered into mediation agreements.Brice promises her that he will get copies of all documents and everything that was taken down by the court reporter at those mediations.He also tells Jenny in response to her question about the possibility of mediation in her case to forget it because mediation is pretty much the same thing as arbitration.Can Brice obtain information from the previous mediators regarding what occurred at the previous mediations?


A) Yes,but only if a court reporter was present.
B) He can get copies of any written documents reviewed but not accounts of statements.
C) He can get accounts of statements but not copies of written documents.
D) He can get the information only if the mediators in the other cases want to cooperate.
E) He cannot get from the mediator copies of documents or accounts of what was said because of the confidential nature of mediation proceedings.

F) B) and C)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Conditional federal jurisdiction means that both state and federal courts have jurisdiction over a case.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Define the term "in personam" jurisdiction,discuss where corporations are generally subject to that type of jurisdiction,and discuss long-arm jurisdiction.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In personam jurisdiction references a co...

View Answer

Revenge.Jane,a first-year law student,while walking to school in inclement weather,accidentally slipped on ice knocking down Greg,another first-year law student,breaking his glasses.He was very angry with Jane and let the air out of one of her car tires.Greg also decided to sue Jane for negligence,claiming as damages $300 for his broken glasses.He decided that he already knew all about the law and did not need a lawyer.Greg sued Jane in state court.Jane,in the same lawsuit,brought an action against Greg for letting the air out of her tire.At trial in state court,Jane told the judge that a friend,Susie,told her that she saw Greg let the air out of Jane's tire.The judge disallowed Jane's testimony on that issue.Susie,however,who was in the courtroom also came and testified to that effect.The state court judge ruled in favor of Jane.Greg said that he was not giving up and that he would seek double damages on appeal in federal court.Jane and Greg live in different states when not attending school.After trial,Jane reported Greg's actions in letting the air out of her tire to the police who said that they would proceed with a criminal action against Greg.Was the judge correct in disallowing Jane's testimony regarding what Susie told her about the tire?


A) No,the judge was wrong and should have considered that testimony.
B) Yes,the judge was correct to disallow the testimony because it involved a possible criminal action.
C) Yes,the judge was correct to disallow the testimony because it was hearsay.
D) Yes,the judge was correct to disallow the testimony because Susie's testimony was better evidence and she was in the courtroom.
E) Yes,the judge was correct to disallow the testimony because it was offered by a defendant,not an independent witness.

F) A) and B)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is required for diversity-of-citizenship?


A) Only that the plaintiff not reside in the same state as the defendant.
B) Only that the plaintiff reside in the same state as the defendant.
C) Only that the controversy concern an amount in excess of $75,000.
D) Only that the controversy concern an amount in excess of $100,000.
E) Both that the plaintiff and the defendant reside in different states and that the controversy concerns an amount in excess of $75,000.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

ADR gives businesses less control over the resolution of a dispute.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A court acquires in personam jurisdiction over the plaintiff when:


A) Service of process is issued.
B) The plaintiff is given a copy of the complaint by the court.
C) The plaintiff files a lawsuit with the court.
D) The defendant files an answer.
E) The plaintiff is injured within the state's border.

F) A) and C)
G) C) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Mediators are selected on behalf of the parties by the courts.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In order to support the mission of alternative dispute resolution,resolving disputes outside of traditional legal channels,lawyers cannot serve as arbitrators.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If an appellate judge agrees with the majority's decision but for different reasons,the judge may write a "dissenting" opinion.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Jackie is hiring Ron to do clean up and maintenance as an independent contractor for her building,which has several tenants.She is aware that Ron has sued some previous building owners.He does a good job,however,and she would like to hire him.Ron has agreed to sign an arbitration agreement.How should Jackie structure the agreement so that it will be enforced?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Student responses will vary.The followin...

View Answer

Supreme Court.Jim,who is a bit eccentric,says that he is fed up with the way a certain employer in his town treats employees and that he is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters.Jim also says that he is going to start his case at the appellate court level,skipping over all those "lesser" judges.Jim says that those justices will surely hear him out and that he will also seek a jury.Although he is not a lawyer,Jim believes that the offenses of the employer are so severe that the justices will appreciate his attempt to make things better for the employees involved.Will an appellate court initially hear Jim's case deciding issues such as whether he has a claim and can act as a plaintiff?


A) Yes,so long as a state trial court judge approves and certifies the case for the appellate court without holding a trial first.
B) Yes,but only if Jim can prove that he would have had to wait at least a year for a trial at the trial court level.
C) No,because Jim is required to first file the case in the appropriate trial court.
D) No,but only because Jim is not employed at the defending company.
E) No,but only because Jim did not have a lawyer.

F) B) and D)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Sexual Harassment ADR.Jenny is very angry with her supervisor,Sleaze,at the Mexican fast-food restaurant at which she works which is owned by an international company located in Mexico.He has been making inappropriate sexual comments to her and other employees.Jenny decides to sue and retains a lawyer,Brice.Brice talks with the owners of the restaurant and is informed that Jenny signed an agreement to arbitrate any claims.Brice tells Jenny that it is completely up to her and that if she wishes,she can disregard the arbitration agreement and proceed to court.Jenny informed Brice about other employees who had complained about sexual harassment and entered into mediation agreements.Brice promises her that he will get copies of all documents and everything that was taken down by the court reporter at those mediations.He also tells Jenny in response to her question about the possibility of mediation in her case to forget it because mediation is pretty much the same thing as arbitration.Did Brice correctly tell Jenny that mediation is nearly the same as arbitration?


A) No,he was incorrect.There are major differences between mediation and arbitration.
B) He was correct because the only difference between the two involves the length of the proceeding.
C) He was correct because the only difference between the two involves cost.
D) He was correct because the only difference between the two involves whether a court reporter is present.
E) He was correct because the only difference between the two involves the type of evidence that may be considered.

F) B) and E)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Courts generally support the use of ADR methods.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 61 - 80 of 109

Related Exams

Show Answer